Ahhh, Blubber Boy NOW claims he was lying THEN about the taped call, but, he's not lying NOW...thanks for clearing that up, lol

Search

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Sooooo, FIRST he had the absolute right to take the documents, and he could de-classify them "in his mind." Then he claimed some Presidential Act ALLOWED him to take the documents, when it does no such thing. Then, because he stupidly allowed himself to be taped, he has been revealed to oth know that he DIDN'T de-classify them when he had the chance, AND ADMITS THAT HE CAN NOW LONGER DO THAT AND THAT THEY'RE TOP SECRET. And, NOW, we get the latest "the dog ate my homework" story: It was 'BRAVADO," you know, LOCKEROOM talk, like "I grab 'em by the pussy." And THIS is the schmuck whose balls you gullible Republi-KUNTS are tonguing to a fare-thee-well, lol. Well, that lockerroom claim didn't work very well in the E. Jean Carroll case, and if you think THIS defense is gonna work, you fucking morons are in for a RUDE awakening. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :highfive::highfive::highfive::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:hung::hung::hung::lie::lie::lie::lock2::lock2::lock2:

‘It was bravado’: Trump says he wasn’t holding up classified documents in 2021 meeting​



Shelby Talcott
Tue, June 27, 2023 at 3:59 PM PDT·4 min read

Former President Donald Trump insisted on Tuesday that he was not showing off classified documents in an audio clip first published by CNN in which he referred to “highly confidential” material and “secret information” that he could no longer declassify.
“I would say it was bravado, if you want to know the truth, it was bravado,” Trump said in an interview aboard his plane with Semafor and ABC News. “I was talking and just holding up papers and talking about them, but I had no documents. I didn’t have any documents.”
The latest comments suggested a new potential legal argument from the former president: That he was overselling the material he was showing to an aide and people working on a biography of former chief of staff Mark Meadows in the recording, a transcript of which featured heavily in his recent federal indictment.


“I just held up a whole pile of — my desk is loaded up with papers. I have papers from 25 different things,” he said, adding he kept relevant news articles about topics like Iran on hand.
At one point, Trump gestured to the seat next to him on the plane, where a stack of various papers — newspapers, copies of his speech, printouts of articles — sat. He grabbed some from the pile and placed them in front of him, moving them around as he spoke and offering up a physical reenactment of what he said was occurring on the audio tape.
Asked about his use of the word “plans” during a Fox News interview earlier Tuesday to describe some items he may have highlighted in the 2021 meeting, Trump insisted he was referring to “building plans” and plans for golf courses strewn about his desk.
“Did I use the word plans?” he said. “What I’m referring to is magazines, newspapers, plans of buildings. I had plans of buildings. You know, building plans? I had plans of a golf course.”
Asked if he had any regrets about his handling of classified documents, Trump said he did not.
“No, I have no regrets,” he said. “I didn't have a classified document. There was no classified document on my desk.”
Asked whether the audio would affect whether he considers a plea deal, Trump said he was confident that the government’s use of the Espionage Act to prosecute him would fail and repeated unverified accusations against President Biden before ending the interview.
“Frankly, that you even ask a question like that's a disgrace,” he said. “So let's end it.”

Room for Disagreement​

National security attorney Bradley Moss told Semafor that a “bravado” defense, in which Trump claimed he was exaggerating the importance of papers that were not actually classified, could be a difficult sell in court.
“One, they’re not charging him with retaining that document,” he said in a text message. “Two, the relevance of the comments in the audio are they speak to Trump’s intent and awareness of the limitations on his ability to have and share classified records. And three, I have no reason to believe Smith would have included this issue without getting clarifying testimony from the various witnesses.”

Know More​

Special counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump earlier this month on charges he mishandled classified documents after leaving office and obstructed the government’s investigation. Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges and accused the Justice Department of targeting him for political purposes. His prosecution, as well as that of one of his aides, Walt Nauta, is being overseen by Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, in federal court in Miami. The Justice Department last week asked that the trial be delayed until December.
On Monday, CNN published an audio recording of a previously reported 2021 conversation in which Trump discussed secret Pentagon documents with a book publisher and writer. “These are the papers,” he says in the tape. Trump told Fox News’ Bret Baier in an interview that aired last week that he had been referring to newspaper and magazine stories, comments the new recording appeared to undercut.

Step Back​

The classified documents prosecution is one of multiple legal threats Trump is staring down as he mounts his third bid for president. He has been charged by New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg in connection with alleged hush-money payments made during his 2016 campaign. Smith is also presiding over the Justice Department investigation into Trump’s actions surrounding the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, while Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is investigating efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the 2020 election results in Georgia.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens

Trump NOW claims he LIED about having classified document. Here's why the "bravado" dog won't hunt​


32K views 53 minutes ago #TeamJustice

Now that Donald Trump has been caught red-handed on an audio recoding disclosing and discussing a classified document about possible military plans to attack a foreign country, Trump is tell his most childish and transparent lies: he says he did not have a classified document but rather was engaged in "bravado." In other words, he claims he was lying.
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,378
Tokens

Trump NOW claims he LIED about having classified document. Here's why the "bravado" dog won't hunt​


32K views 53 minutes ago #TeamJustice

Now that Donald Trump has been caught red-handed on an audio recoding disclosing and discussing a classified document about possible military plans to attack a foreign country, Trump is tell his most childish and transparent lies: he says he did not have a classified document but rather was engaged in "bravado." In other words, he claims he was lying.


^^^^^

Now that Donald Trump has been caught red-handed on an audio recoding disclosing and discussing a classified document about possible military plans to attack a foreign country

The Iran document doesn’t even exist .

LMFAO !
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
^^^^^

Now that Donald Trump has been caught red-handed on an audio recoding disclosing and discussing a classified document about possible military plans to attack a foreign country

The Iran document doesn’t even exist .

LMFAO !
Oh, REALLY? So, are YOU, LENBO, the fat, blubbery welching DUMBO, privy to information the REST of us aren't? Elaborate, Oh Wise One.

Donald Trump's latest excuse doesn't pass the smell test (Get USED to the scene below where your dumb ass is being booked, it's gonna happen AT LEAST two more times, lol)​

Hunter, author

by Hunter for Daily Kos
Daily Kos Staff
Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 1:26:32p PDT
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...nd-he-has-the-right-to-remain-silent#comments

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 04: Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for his arraignment at Manhattan Criminal Court on April 04, 2023 in New York City. With the indictment, Trump becomes the first former U.S. president in history to be charged with a criminal offense. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Donald Trump has been spinning like a top since the news first surfaced that special counsel Jack Smith has an actual audio recording of Trump showing off a classified national security document to aides and two Mark Meadows ghostwriters inside his Bedminster club. And by "spinning like a top" we mean lying his ass off in numerous contradictory ways, that being all the man knows how to do. It's gotten worse since the audio was actually leaked to the press.
His latest try, this time in an interview with ABC News for some reason, is to claim "bravado."











I would say it was bravado, if you want to know the truth, it was bravado,” Trump said in an interview aboard his plane with Semafor and ABC News. “I was talking and just holding up papers and talking about them, but I had no documents. I didn’t have any documents.

First off, we're going to find the person who taught Trump his newest favorite word, "bravado," and we're going to be having some words for them. "Bravado" is not an actual criminal defense, and Donald Trump does not actually mean "bravado" when he says "bravado" because "bravado" actually means something completely different.
What Trump means, when he says "bravado," is "I was lying." The man has about 50 different euphemisms for "I was lying," because he often gets caught in lies but can never, ever actually own up to the lying, and that's how we get Captain Golfboy here blustering that he was holding up "papers," not "documents," and that he's never even seen a "document," and you're all against him for saying otherwise.
For the record—and that's another phrase Donald is going to be hearing quite a few times in upcoming months—the recorded audio from the meeting has Trump talking about a document "presented" by "the Defense Department" and Gen. Mark Milley. "Except it is like highly controversial, secret, this is secret information, look at this! The attack ..."
"This was done by the military and given to me," he again insisted, before stumbling his way into the big money quote: "As president I could have declassified it, now I can’t, you know, but this is classified."
None of that is ambiguous, and none of the assembled staffers, dregs of society they may be for still being willing to work for a sedition-backing compost heap, would have been tricked by Trump holding up a copy of a People magazine or a New York Times clipping while telling them all it was "done by the military and given to me" and "classified." There are multiple witnesses who can describe what sort of "papers" Trump was showing them, and almost certainly several of them have already testified to a grand jury about what they saw because while many, many people are willing to lie to protect Trump, nobody is going to commit federal big boy perjury when they know full well that prosecutors have also interviewed every other person in that room and if the stories don't all match up exactly then it's not just Donald's name that might be on Jack Smith's next indictment.
So no, this new Trump declaration that he wasn't actually holding up any "documents," it was just a bunch of "papers" that he was claiming to be classified for no particular reason, is even worse than his last few days worth of other excuses, most of them contradictory, all of them transparently nonsensical.
Trump has no actual defense on this one. The Yahoo! News story from which the first blockquote above is lifted follows with a line claiming that the "latest comments suggested a new potential legal argument from the former president." That's complete nonsense as well because "I didn't have any documents" is not a "potential legal argument" when you have multiple witnesses who can describe to prosecutors what the documents looked like and a prosecution team that more likely than not does know exactly which classified document matches that description, because Trump helpfully described it as a secret "attack" plan aimed at Iran, presented by Gen. Mark Milley, and there are an extremely small subset of classified documents that check all those boxes. Smith's team knows what document he's talking about. The grand jury may already have been shown a redacted version of the document he's talking about, because prosecutors would almost certainly have sought to get a redacted version of that document so that they could show each witness the blurred-over version and then asked, is this what Trump showed you?
Everything Trump is burping out right now is an attempt to defend himself in the court of public opinion, and apparently has not yet to dawned on the big seditionist blowhard that the court of public opinion does not matter one damn bit here: He needs to worry about actual Court court, the legal one with the robes and the guys carrying handcuffs and the inherent power to put him in federal prison, even if Donald and the hosts of the Fox News primetime lineup just super do not want that to happen.
Trump was caught with codeword-classified national security secrets hidden inside his for-profit Florida club. At his New Jersey club, he was caught showing aides military attack plans for a possible Iran strike, long after he had absolutely no business carrying such information between golf courses, and his self-described reason for showing off national security secrets was because he wanted to win a petty personal war against a military general he didn't like.
At this point you get the feeling that special counsel Jack Smith and the rest of his team have only indicted Trump because Donald kept doing such astonishingly criminal things that Smith felt he didn't even have a choice in the matter. The Department of Justice has been ignoring, slow-walking, and downplaying apparent criminality by Trump for years and even after an actual attempted coup; it's been agonizingly clear that nobody in Justice wants to touch Trump with a ten foot pole if they can help it. But then here comes Donald again, storing nuclear secrets in a Mar-a-Lago bathroom and bragging about Iran attack plans to a Mark Meadows ghostwriter.
A Mark Meadows ghostwriter! Do you know how far down "Mark Meadows ghostwriter" is on the list of people who deserve to see classified military attack plans?
Smith and his prosecutors have probably been crying into their coffee for six months now, trying to come up with some way to not put Trump in federal prison, even as Trump wanders by again with another batch of top secret papers stuffed into his socks.
The kicker to all of this, and why Trump really should be shutting up right now, is that no matter what he may have been doing with his haphazard storage of classified documents inside Mar-a-Lago, whipping out a specific national security document inside Bedminster and intentionally showing it to meeting participants in order to make a petty personal point comes perilously close to “disclosing” classified secrets, also known as the actual "espionage" part of the Espionage Act. We now have proof that Trump didn't just hide classified documents from the government in an attempt to keep them, we've got proof that Trump disclosed classified documents to unauthorized viewers in an attempt at personal gain.
There's nobody in America who sincerely still thinks that Trump would not share the same document with Saudi Arabian government officials or other important "business partners," if he's willing to wave Pentagon attack plans at a damn Mark Meadows ghostwriter. Every time Trump opens his mouth it just reminds federal investigators that he's still lying about everything he's ever told them—and is probably still hiding a lot they don't even know about yet.
 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,378
Tokens
Oh, REALLY? So, are YOU, LENBO, the fat, blubbery welching DUMBO, privy to information the REST of us aren't? Elaborate, Oh Wise One.

Donald Trump's latest excuse doesn't pass the smell test (Get USED to the scene below where your dumb ass is being booked, it's gonna happen AT LEAST two more times, lol)​

Hunter, author

by Hunter for Daily Kos
Daily Kos Staff
Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 1:26:32p PDT
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...nd-he-has-the-right-to-remain-silent#comments

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 04: Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for his arraignment at Manhattan Criminal Court on April 04, 2023 in New York City. With the indictment, Trump becomes the first former U.S. president in history to be charged with a criminal offense. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Donald Trump has been spinning like a top since the news first surfaced that special counsel Jack Smith has an actual audio recording of Trump showing off a classified national security document to aides and two Mark Meadows ghostwriters inside his Bedminster club. And by "spinning like a top" we mean lying his ass off in numerous contradictory ways, that being all the man knows how to do. It's gotten worse since the audio was actually leaked to the press.
His latest try, this time in an interview with ABC News for some reason, is to claim "bravado."













First off, we're going to find the person who taught Trump his newest favorite word, "bravado," and we're going to be having some words for them. "Bravado" is not an actual criminal defense, and Donald Trump does not actually mean "bravado" when he says "bravado" because "bravado" actually means something completely different.
What Trump means, when he says "bravado," is "I was lying." The man has about 50 different euphemisms for "I was lying," because he often gets caught in lies but can never, ever actually own up to the lying, and that's how we get Captain Golfboy here blustering that he was holding up "papers," not "documents," and that he's never even seen a "document," and you're all against him for saying otherwise.
For the record—and that's another phrase Donald is going to be hearing quite a few times in upcoming months—the recorded audio from the meeting has Trump talking about a document "presented" by "the Defense Department" and Gen. Mark Milley. "Except it is like highly controversial, secret, this is secret information, look at this! The attack ..."
"This was done by the military and given to me," he again insisted, before stumbling his way into the big money quote: "As president I could have declassified it, now I can’t, you know, but this is classified."
None of that is ambiguous, and none of the assembled staffers, dregs of society they may be for still being willing to work for a sedition-backing compost heap, would have been tricked by Trump holding up a copy of a People magazine or a New York Times clipping while telling them all it was "done by the military and given to me" and "classified." There are multiple witnesses who can describe what sort of "papers" Trump was showing them, and almost certainly several of them have already testified to a grand jury about what they saw because while many, many people are willing to lie to protect Trump, nobody is going to commit federal big boy perjury when they know full well that prosecutors have also interviewed every other person in that room and if the stories don't all match up exactly then it's not just Donald's name that might be on Jack Smith's next indictment.
So no, this new Trump declaration that he wasn't actually holding up any "documents," it was just a bunch of "papers" that he was claiming to be classified for no particular reason, is even worse than his last few days worth of other excuses, most of them contradictory, all of them transparently nonsensical.
Trump has no actual defense on this one. The Yahoo! News story from which the first blockquote above is lifted follows with a line claiming that the "latest comments suggested a new potential legal argument from the former president." That's complete nonsense as well because "I didn't have any documents" is not a "potential legal argument" when you have multiple witnesses who can describe to prosecutors what the documents looked like and a prosecution team that more likely than not does know exactly which classified document matches that description, because Trump helpfully described it as a secret "attack" plan aimed at Iran, presented by Gen. Mark Milley, and there are an extremely small subset of classified documents that check all those boxes. Smith's team knows what document he's talking about. The grand jury may already have been shown a redacted version of the document he's talking about, because prosecutors would almost certainly have sought to get a redacted version of that document so that they could show each witness the blurred-over version and then asked, is this what Trump showed you?
Everything Trump is burping out right now is an attempt to defend himself in the court of public opinion, and apparently has not yet to dawned on the big seditionist blowhard that the court of public opinion does not matter one damn bit here: He needs to worry about actual Court court, the legal one with the robes and the guys carrying handcuffs and the inherent power to put him in federal prison, even if Donald and the hosts of the Fox News primetime lineup just super do not want that to happen.
Trump was caught with codeword-classified national security secrets hidden inside his for-profit Florida club. At his New Jersey club, he was caught showing aides military attack plans for a possible Iran strike, long after he had absolutely no business carrying such information between golf courses, and his self-described reason for showing off national security secrets was because he wanted to win a petty personal war against a military general he didn't like.
At this point you get the feeling that special counsel Jack Smith and the rest of his team have only indicted Trump because Donald kept doing such astonishingly criminal things that Smith felt he didn't even have a choice in the matter. The Department of Justice has been ignoring, slow-walking, and downplaying apparent criminality by Trump for years and even after an actual attempted coup; it's been agonizingly clear that nobody in Justice wants to touch Trump with a ten foot pole if they can help it. But then here comes Donald again, storing nuclear secrets in a Mar-a-Lago bathroom and bragging about Iran attack plans to a Mark Meadows ghostwriter.
A Mark Meadows ghostwriter! Do you know how far down "Mark Meadows ghostwriter" is on the list of people who deserve to see classified military attack plans?
Smith and his prosecutors have probably been crying into their coffee for six months now, trying to come up with some way to not put Trump in federal prison, even as Trump wanders by again with another batch of top secret papers stuffed into his socks.
The kicker to all of this, and why Trump really should be shutting up right now, is that no matter what he may have been doing with his haphazard storage of classified documents inside Mar-a-Lago, whipping out a specific national security document inside Bedminster and intentionally showing it to meeting participants in order to make a petty personal point comes perilously close to “disclosing” classified secrets, also known as the actual "espionage" part of the Espionage Act. We now have proof that Trump didn't just hide classified documents from the government in an attempt to keep them, we've got proof that Trump disclosed classified documents to unauthorized viewers in an attempt at personal gain.
There's nobody in America who sincerely still thinks that Trump would not share the same document with Saudi Arabian government officials or other important "business partners," if he's willing to wave Pentagon attack plans at a damn Mark Meadows ghostwriter. Every time Trump opens his mouth it just reminds federal investigators that he's still lying about everything he's ever told them—and is probably still hiding a lot they don't even know about yet.


Document not among “illegal retention charges”

Former Senior DOJ official, “..in a way it might be analogous to try to prove a murder case without a body.”

?

I’ll repeat . It doesn’t exist .

Swallow it whole you gullible fool . And there’s a good chance the audio might be ruled inadmissible by your favorite Judge Aileen Cannon

:arrowhead:


 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,635
Tokens
Document not among “illegal retention charges”

Former Senior DOJ official, “..in a way it might be analogous to try to prove a murder case without a body.”

?

I’ll repeat . It doesn’t exist .

Swallow it whole you gullible fool . And there’s a good chance the audio might be ruled inadmissible by your favorite Judge Aileen Cannon

:arrowhead:


Lol. Ignorant fuck slings and slings. SHEKNOWS SheFinds and Commie China news source. This poor bitch. What a miserable fuck to be him
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
by Hunter for Daily Kos
Daily Kos Staff

nuff said
Suck COCK, DUMBO, who are YOUR sources, you stupid, welching cunt? Oh, here's another inch of a foot long dong being slid into Blubber Boy's Bulbous Butt, lol.


ANNUTTER possible Trump indictment SURGES into spotlight​


 

RX Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
16,378
Tokens
Suck COCK, DUMBO, who are YOUR sources, you stupid, welching cunt? Oh, here's another inch of a foot long dong being slid into Blubber Boy's Bulbous Butt, lol.


ANNUTTER possible Trump indictment SURGES into spotlight​




Look up at post #5 you penniless knuckle dragger and wake me when the Iran document is brought into evidence .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,241
Messages
13,565,816
Members
100,771
Latest member
Bronco87
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com